The recent decision of Moor J in TY v XA [2024] EWFC 96 (24 April 2024) has received attention as the first reported MFPA 1984 Part III leave/set aside case since the Supreme Court decision in Potanina v Potanin [2024] UKSC 3 (31 January 2024). The judgment contains some helpful clarifications including that applications for leave
Lucy Greenwood, Lawyer, Partner and guest speaker, joins host, Chloe O. ‘The Divorce and Separation Coach’, in a podcast discussing the following questions: When do couples have a choice with regards to the jurisdiction they get divorced in? What are the implications of this decision? What should they consider when
Prime Minister Winston Churchill first described co-operation between the UK and the US as the “Special Relationship” – a term frequently cited in a whole host of varying political, economic and social circumstances. With over 200,000 Americans calling the UK home, it is perhaps little surprise that this Special Relationship
The Spring Budget 2024 was announced on 6 March 2024. Whilst the Budget did not help to fill the public’s wallet as much as hoped, it nevertheless introduced changes about which family law practitioners, and separating families should be aware of*. *With a general election this year, these policies might
Following the breakdown of a relationship, children will undoubtedly be affected by their ability to spend less time with each of their parents. A subsequent consequence in the breakdown of the family unit will be the impact on the child or children’s relationship with their wider paternal or maternal family.
Summary When the UK left the EU, and new domestic legislation was needed to replace EU law, the UK government said in relation to divorce jurisdiction of England and Wales that it would follow, be the same as, the EU law. This was for very justifiable reasons of continuity and
On 31 January 2024 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of Potanin and Potanina [1]. For a summary of the background to the proceedings and an overview of the judgment please click here. The key dates in the proceedings are as follows: 8 October 2018: The wife
This is a very common but important question for international families as it can impact, amongst other things, a person’s ability to remarry, their inheritance rights or potential tax liabilities. How the English Court’s approach this question The approach to recognition of an overseas divorce depends on where and when
Potanin v Potanina: The Supreme Court Decision On 31 January 2024 the Supreme Court handed down the much-awaited judgment in Potanin v Potanina [1]. These proceedings relate to financial claims which can be brought in England for financial provision after an overseas divorce. Although the parties in this case have
There is no disputing the fact that the Family Courts continue to face considerable workload pressures, undoubtedly exacerbated during the Covid-19 pandemic. Judges and Court staff are under considerable pressure to ensure that there is continued access to timely justice. However, with increased pressure, demand, and workload, delay to financial
Octagon Point
5 Cheapside
St Paul’s
London
EC2V 6AA
The International Family Law Group LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England (company number OC362777) whose registered office is at Octagon Point, 5 Cheapside, St Paul’s, London EC2V 6AA. A list of the members of the LLP is displayed at the above address together with a list of those individuals designated as partners who are not members of the LLP. We are a firm of solicitors practicing in the UK. As solicitors we are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA ID: 560727) and are subject to the Solicitors Code of Conduct 2011
Terms and Conditions | Privacy and Cookie Policy | Disclaimer | Diversity | Complaints | Glossary | Sitemap | Newsletter Sign Up
International Family Law Group LLP. All Rights Reserved © 2024
